CORRELATION BETWEEN ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) AND CONFLICT STYLE IN THE WORKPLACE
CORRELATION BETWEEN ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) AND CONFLICT STYLE IN THE WORKPLACE
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2022
Authors
CAROLINA ARAUJO RAMOS
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
In the past decades, a very wide and rich understanding of conflict, conflict at work and human
behaviour towards adversity and conflict has been developed. Research has been done about the
theories, sources, processes and many other aspects of all these themes. However, unfortunately,
none of this has much of a practical use if people (who are at the basis of all these studies) do not
know or apply the useful knowledge and techniques developed so far. The Adversity Quotient
concept was developed by Dr Paul G. Stoltz and has to do with an individual capacity to adapt to and
handle challenging situations can be measured and developed. Amy Gallo, author of the HBR Guide
to dealing with conflict, explores how identifying what is people´s natural tendency toward conflict
is makes a difference when managing disputes in the workplace. The goals of this research was to
determine how conflict styles in the workplace relate to AQ and assess how widespread these two
theories were amongst the population. In addition, the study aimed to determine the prevalence
of knowledge and real-life application of them and, to contribute to the relevant literature with its
findings. The chosen methodology was primary research based on questionnaires and Pearson
´coefficient for further analysis. The results found show that these two concepts are not vastly
widespread, but even amongst people who are familiarized with them, they are not put to practice.
AQ and both conflict styles are not directly related analysed while mixed, however, individually,
each conflict style presents a linear correlation with the same population AQ scores. This shows that
different theories can relate and add to improved and developed ways people can deal with
difficulties and conflict in the workplace. Individually, theories are more known than used. Instead
of studying separate theories, people might be able to apply a mix of attitudes an better their work
environment and life.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Ramos, 2022